Islamabad: Supreme Court (SC) while accepting the intra court appeals of federal government and other affectees has declared null and void the decision and restored the NAB amendment Bill.SC accepted government and others appeals and restored NAB amendments bill.While announcing decision of NAB amendment case court remarked PTI founder Imran Khan could not prove NAB amendments are unconstitutional.The decision said 3-member bench of SC could not prove NAB amendments run contrary to the constitution.SC had reserved judgment on June 6 . Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa read out judgment.A 5-member larger bench of SC had heard this case.CJP Isa headed the five-judge bench comprising Justice Aminuddin Khan, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi.Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Hassan Azhar Rizvi wrote additional notes.The decision said NAB law was made by former army chief Pervez Musharraf after 34 days of his coming into powe r forcibly. Pervez Musharraf threw out constitutional democratic order and enacted legislation for himself. Pervez Musharraf removed those judges of superior judiciary who did not approve unconstitutional steps.it was further said in the decision the role of judiciary and legislature is clear in the constitution. The judiciary and legislature should take utmost care in connection with interference in the jurisdiction of each other.The judgment said CJP and judges of SC are not gate keepers of parliament. The constitutional institutions should respect each other. The legislation of parliament should not be declared null and void. It does not mean legislation against the constitution will not be declared null and void.The decision said the plea for constituting 5-member bench on the petition against NAB amendment was rejected. Had Justice Mansoor Ali Shah isolated him from the bench then neither two members bench could hear the petition against the amendment nor could it make decision.Third amen dment in NAB laws was not reviewed in SC decision. Petition and SC decision don't conform to the constitution. if two interpretations of any law come then interpretation which comes in favor of law will be accepted.Mr Niazi himself was architect of several amendments among these amendments. Mr Niazi did not file the petition with good intent. Petition of Mr Niazi was not maintainable in SC.The decision said it has not been told in the decision related to NAB that how the NAB amendments are in conflict with basic rights. Constitution does not allow judges to assess law on their own criterion. Judges are bound to law and constitution as per their oath.The decision said SC cannot play the role of gate keeper of parliament. Chief justice and judges cannot be gate keeper for parliament.